Talk:Wari-Bateshwar ruins

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

"Wari-Bateshwar ruins" or "Wari-Bateshwar" edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How about renaming the site as "Wari-Bateshwar" ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.64.52.185 (talk) 10:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Informations of this page conflicts the history of Bengal and also the history of Pundrabardhana. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Audittwa Shapla (talk • contribs) 17:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Spelling and date notation edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The orginal version] of this article uses US spelling (artifact rather than artefact) and the BCE era notation, no discussion appears on the talk page about changing era or spelling, and the current spelling is inconsistent. Considering that although English is not the primary language in Bangladesh, when English is written there, it is usually the British version, I suggest British is the most appropriate variety of English for this article, and the original era notation should be maintained. Thoughts? Jc3s5h (talk) 12:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic