Talk:War Industries Board

Military history: North America / United States / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

Change Format? edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can someone change the format? I don't think wikipedia endorses the "school report" format with an included bibliography

Done. If that material belongs in Wikipedia, it belongs in the individual articles. If anyone wants to move it, it's still in the article history. The very first sentence I checked was incorrect, so I didn't bother. - Crosbiesmith (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Biased edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It seems very biased, and leftist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.233.83.120 (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The remark itself appears to be biased; without a point of reference, examples. The section is not helpful nor constructive. Moreover, it is unsigned and old (2008). I nominate that this section be deleted. RWyman^t@lk 17:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Lack of information edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article fails to address the ending of the War Industries Board.

I know most of that history. I'm actively looking for sources to cite. RWyman^t@lk 17:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Original members? edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The text says "seven" original members of the board, but the bullet points list eight. Dgorsline (talk) 12:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Dgorsline, good point, I did some research and found the 7 original members in American Industry in the War: A Report of the War Industries Board. New York: Prentice-Hall, p.22.Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic