Talk:Wantage Code

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 01:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the Wantage Code, a record of laws promulgated by the English king Æthelred the Unready and his councillors around 997, may provide the earliest description of a jury of presentment? Source: Article cites https://eel.cch.kcl.ac.uk/laws/texts/iii-atr/
  • Reviewed:

Created by Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk). Self-nominated at 14:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Wantage Code; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Not a full review, but this hook must be shortened because it's 223 characters long; the absolute maximum length for a single-article hook is 200 characters. We can reduce the hook to 191 characters by removing "(otherwise called III Æthelred)" (which doesn't need to be bold anyway). The character limit notwithstanding, this parenthetical actually makes the hook more unwieldy to read and doesn't add much to the interestingness of the hook. Epicgenius (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

• I've edited it per the suggestion, thanks. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 14:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

The article is fresh and not just long enough but also appears to be comprehensive. The cited sources are of the highest quality. Spot checks have not indicated any close paraphrasing (not that I would expect any from Deacon of Pndapetzim). The hook source link does not work but I was able to verify it in other places. The penance for old sins being a possible motivation seemed very interesting to me, so I wonder if it could be incorporated into the hook. I would recommend (though it is not required for DYK) the use of Template:Sfn for citing sources because it links the notes to the bibliography. Aside from that, this article seems to be of GA quality. Surtsicna (talk) 18:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, Surtsicna, appreciate the comments! The reference in question, I'm not sure why it's suddenly down. The Early English Laws project is/was an AHRC funded resource developed by King's College/University of London to be an online resource, but when the money ran out they stopped properly maintaining it (so often this is the case with these projects!), which led to John Hudson at St Andrews getting St Andrews to take it over and restore it. This meant that the content from the original London website was duplicated on the St Andrews website but formatted differently. Possibly the London link being down is temporary, but it may be that the transfer has concluded as this nomination has been live. You can see the same info in the St Andrews link here, see under synopsis. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 20:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)