Talk:Vulture crown

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2001:8003:8888:4E00:8DB3:A7EB:E989:E0F8 in topic Sources

Sources

edit

Neither of the sources here I believe are up the standards of Wikipedia. I clicked on this article hoping for a nice piece of new history instead I find one link that doesn't work (at least for me), and another that seems like a primary or high school history lesson. It has references of it's own, so I clicked on them. #1 Doesn't explain where it's getting the information from. Firefox blocks #2 as a dangerous website, #3 doesn't explain where it's getting this information from, #4 leads to a dead page, #5 doesn't explain where it's getting this information from, #6 is a book I don't have access to.

I really don't think this information is trustworthy. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, it looks like their assuming from depictions of it in art. But who's doing the assuming? Is it premier Egyptologists, or whatever you call experts in this field? If so why isn't the article linking to those people? It says above the subject/headline that "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable" and to me (and others given the template asking for more sources), this information isn't verifiable. 2001:8003:8888:4E00:8DB3:A7EB:E989:E0F8 (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply