 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R-1820 Twin Wasp ? edit
Can someone please verify this Information ? Afaik the 1820 was the Cyclone, the Twin Wasp was the R-1830, not the R-1820. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.132.159.169 (talk) 14:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- pages are at Wright R-1820 Cyclone & Pratt & Whitney R-1830 Twin Wasp.NiD.29 (talk) 23:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Page name edit
The USAAC was a minor operator - 5! yet the page uses their designation and the USAAC and Brazilians (with 26) are listed under major operators in the infobox while the Chinese (107), Turks (40) and Russians (32) all used more but are ignored. NiD.29 (talk) 00:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move. Cúchullain t/c 15:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Vultee YA-19 → Vultee V-11 – Vultee V-11 was the primary designation - YA-19 applies to only 7 aircraft, the V-11 designation to 146 aircraft, including those 7.NiD.29 (talk) 00:37, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Move - as stated, YA-19 designnation only applied to seven aircraft that saw very limited service. V-11 designation covers a much larger number of aircraft, some of which saw much more significant service than the seven USAAF examples.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.