Talk:Virginia State Route 7 Business (Purcellville)/GA1
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ritchie333 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Fredddie (talk · contribs) 17:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Two of the sections of the article are entirely unsourced.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- I am not from Virginia, so I only know where a few cities are. I can honestly say I have no idea where this highway is located. There is no geospatial context, whether it be a map or KML file, to tell the reader where the highway lies.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
(stalking) I had a brief look at this, and I can endorse Fredddie's opinion that this does not meet the GA criteria. Furthermore, I'd suggest it's a prime candidate to be deleted, as it appears not to cite any significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources and I'd focus on getting sources such as significant news or book sources in the article ASAP. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:54, 5 October 2013 (UTC)