Talk:Vincible and invincible ignorance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Rotideypoc41352 in topic Sources
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Invincible ignorance (Catholic theology) page were merged into Vincible and invincible ignorance on 14 March 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
lead section edit
The lead paragraph of this article is too abstract for general readers uneducated in the topic to understand what it is about. The rest of the article seems to flesh it out a little bit. If I understand correctly, the article is about whether ignorance of the law is or is not an excuse for committing a sin?
 | This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. (February 2013) |
Bwrs (talk) 23:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- What a mess. The start of the article is nonsense
- "Vincible ignorance is, in Catholic ethics, a moral or doctrinal matter that could have been removed"
- What on earth does it mean to "remove" a "moral or doctinal matter"? And it only gets worse from there. By the way, templates go into article space, not talk space. patsw (talk) 22:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Sources edit
@Brian kindly listed sources that anyone can use to improve the article over at Talk:Invincible ignorance (Catholic theology)#Resources for future editors. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 06:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)