Talk:Vernon Sturdee/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   This is awkward: Heavy losses in the fighting at Fromelles prevented the 5th Division from participating in the Battle of the Somme, but to free up another division to participate, II Anzac Corps organised "Franks Force" to take over a divisional frontage in the Houplines sector

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Need place of publication for McNicholl. Was it published by the Royal Australian Engineers?

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Was he promoted to LtGen in 1940 as per lede or in 1939 as per main body? It seems both are correct, but clarify in the lede.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• All issues addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:17, 30 October 2012 (UTC)