Talk:Vanderhoof Airport
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Airport Manager in topic Merger proposal
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vanderhoof Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merger proposal edit
The two water aerodrome articles are perpetual stubs. The known limited cited content available comprises brief mentions in the airport article. DMBanks1 (talk) 17:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Opposed There should not be three infoboxes in one article. These are three different places, Vanderhoof Airport and Vanderhoof Water Aerodrome are about three kilometres apart. They are operated by different groups. The third aerodrome, Vanderhoof (District) Water Aerodrome, has been listed as closed since 2020. The correct action would be to redirect Vanderhoof Water Aerodrome and Vanderhoof (District) Water Aerodrome to correct sections on List of airports in British Columbia. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- After researching aviation in the vicinity, I reached the conclusion that the stand-alone float plane operations lacked notability. Consequently, it is impossible for these very slender stubs to expand much beyond the present single sentence. I appreciate that the merger proposal could be misunderstood. A more realistic suggestion may be to just delete the stub articles on the grounds of notability. DMBanks1 (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Some were but others were redirected.
Airport Manager, Talk, Contributions 00:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Sorry. Wrong account. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Some were but others were redirected.
- After researching aviation in the vicinity, I reached the conclusion that the stand-alone float plane operations lacked notability. Consequently, it is impossible for these very slender stubs to expand much beyond the present single sentence. I appreciate that the merger proposal could be misunderstood. A more realistic suggestion may be to just delete the stub articles on the grounds of notability. DMBanks1 (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2023 (UTC)