Talk:Usual judgment

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merging with highest median voting rules

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Majority Judgment and Usual judgment articles restate much of the info presented in the Highest median voting rules article and the two voting systems differ only in their tiebreaker rules, with the main difference in each being "advantages" sections, which can probably be summarized in a more general comparison section. Anecdotally, I was rather confused about the systems until I read this article and understood they differ only in tie-breaking methods. Putnam3145 (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic