| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the UseModWiki article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 August 2. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | CvWiki was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on July 23, 2008 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into UseModWiki. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
usemod.com edit
The domain usemod.com appears to be squatted, very recently -- I was browsing the site last week, but today it loads park.js from sedoparking.com. Is the project dead or did the owner just fumble a domain renewal? TTK (talk) 20:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- I accidentally found that it has been moved to usemod.org in September 2023 without any notice. I am not sure about if it happened purposely, or the site owner suddenly lost the original domain. 🐱💬 08:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
CVWiki edit
In this article, CVWiki is denoted as CvWiki, but official name should be CVWiki whose V is capitalized. AkiGoto (talk) 02:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Version histories edit
WP:NOTCHANGELOG says the following:
Exhaustive logs of software updates. Use reliable third-party (not self-published or official) sources in articles dealing with software updates to describe the versions listed or discussed in the article. Common sense must be applied regarding the level of detail to include. A list of every version/beta/patch is inappropriate. Consider a summary of development instead.
The sources in the version history of this article were neither reliable nor third-party. All of them were self-published/official. This is insufficient to persist them here. That is why they were removed and should not be reinstated until such sources can be identified. Izno (talk) 17:16, 7 January 2024 (UTC)