Talk:Uruguayan cuisine/Archive 1

Archive 1

Previously top posted comments

Im fearing that article is resulting a bit large, please tell me what do you think do you like it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neurorebel (talk • contribs) 21:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Please give some patience, im tryng to make from this a nice article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neurorebel (talk • contribs) 19:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC) unsigned comment added by Neurorebel (talk • contribs) 03:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Im about to resume on this after a large pause, thanks to everybody that contributed here and feel free to contribute more, its not a personal article but is still my goal to expand and improve it. --Neurorebel (talk) 01:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

To do

Add section bread cheese and chacinados, sandwich caliente and sandwich olimpíco Add pastel de carne somewhere (chupin de perscado). Add desserts massini, gofio and mazamorra con leche. --Neurorebel (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Section "Common dishes"

I think it should be removed once the article is complete. Im working on a finished version on my sandbox.

History

It would be easier to talk about History of Uruguayan cuisine if we validate this somewhat obscure source [1], it talks about three stages of it though is the only source where I can trace it.--Neurorebel (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Overlinking

Hello. This seems to be a promising article. It of course still needs work. One of the problems is overlinking; usually only the first instance of a word is wikilinked if necessary, please see MOS:DUPLINK for more information. Thanks, — PaleoNeonate — 15:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Additional note: the "main article:" links can of course remain. — PaleoNeonate — 15:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your favorable prospects; in Spanish Wikipedia they say that I abuse of that template so may be that some of them are excessive, about overlinking the truth is that i kew about it's discouragement but i didn't knew of that rule of thumb of yours, it is badly useful so i will employ it furthermore, however overlinking has an advantage at developing since sentences move upwards and backwards in this stage and you never know where a link can end it's placing. The article is nearly mature so they can go.--Neurorebel (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Nice. It is possible that the style guide is different on the Spanish Wikipedia too. — PaleoNeonate — 13:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Some suggestions for the article

Hello everyone, this looks like it could be a really cool article. Here are some ways that I think it could be made better! First of all I think a restructuring of almost every single category so that they would more closely match the way that the categories of foods look on the 'Cuisine of the United States' page in the 'Desserts' section. They linked each item to its specific page rather than give each item its own singular sentence that makes that page look more incomplete than it might be in reality.

The section "Salads and Barbecue" should be renamed to solely "Salads" because it does not once mention Barbecue, and only meat three small times. On the same note, the section "Asado" should be renamed to Barbecue and in the text it should mention the Uruguayan word for Barbecue.

Most of the information that is currently in the lead section of this article would be better used in the article itself and would work to bulk up some of the skinnier sections. The sentence about the mistrust of "the colonies" against the natives should probably have its own section by itself (or even its own article, although there is no mention of this mistrust in the Uraguay article itself? POV?)

The whole part about the different influences on the cusine could have its own section including the different types and maybe any conflicts (if any) that occur

Kb10r (talk) 21:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Fruit consumption in Uruguay

If you take a look [here|http://www.helgilibrary.com/indicators/fruit-consumption-per-capita/uruguay/] is enunciable that amount of fruit consumption in Uruguay has a much more stable tendency when compared to the world, world fruit consumption increased almost exponentially while Uruguay remains much more stable with just an upper tendency. This means that as if it started higher at the sixties it is now beneath world average. The media of that graphic is still low to Uruguay. What is more: the part of the article that mentionedfruit that refenced much more on raw fruit not "dulce de membrillo".--Neurorebel (talk) 01:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC) @Faccam: May shared this article http://www.helgilibrary.com/indicators/fruit-consumption-per-capita/uruguay/ fruit concumption is sporadically superior.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Empanada Frita.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 16 May 2019 (UTC)