Talk:United States Senate Republican primary election in Mississippi, 2014
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States Senate Republican primary election in Mississippi, 2014 redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tea Party POV
editThis article has a heavy Tea Party POV, particularly in the Race Card scandal section. In that section, there's no argument on behalf of Cochran's campaign or the "establishment," except for an alleged argument from Barbour that's quickly "discredited" in the next section. Hence, I'm adding a POV tag to the page. Orser67 (talk) 10:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Who would be the most appropriate member of the Republican Establishment to present an argument for the other side here? 64.134.180.210 (talk) 22:30, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Racist advertising
editThere is a strong urge on part of some to wish that racist ads weren't used in the primary, and thus, to expunge any verifiable information about it from the article. Be it funding trail, places where the actual advertisements can be viewed, or otherwise. It seems readily apparent that the first thing said editors are going to need to do is make their case that "food stamps" is not racist in the context. If that is the case, perhaps you will be re-writing(removing) half of the content on several of Wikipedia's other pages that delve into this similar theme. If so, this will be the first time that "food stamps" is not racist(in the context) in decades. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.59.92.70 (talk) 04:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)