Talk:Unifine mill

Write=up

I have read the Unifine mill write-up and find it to be accurate with no need of further revision. I am currently studying three milling systems at Washington State University, the unifine, roller, and stone mills, and find this presentation acceptable. E. Patrick Fuerst, Assistant Research Professor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epfuerst (talk • contribs)

No need of further revision? Give us a break. We don't need your Domino Nabisco here. Not trying to be rude but your comments come across as pretentious.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 03:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Spam?

http://unifinemill.blogspot.com ("This blog will be dedicated to improving the flour mill industry by highlighting a unique milling system...") says: "Please feel free to checkout the Wiki posting on wikipedia. It is still currently a work in progress, but will provide a basic overview of the Unifine Milling system." Are we being spammed? --Northernhenge (talk) 23:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

What do they look like?

--TiagoTiago (talk) 19:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Agree that this sounds a bit one sided.

In particular this article needs clarification (and citation) concerning how the end product is *better* than other methods of creating whole wheat flours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlneumiller (talk • contribs) 21:06, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

What is it?

This article fails to tell how a unifine is any different than a roller mill. There is almost no description of how it works, other than whole wheat is better. Comfr (talk) 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

After a day of reading the references, Unifine seems to be or was a brand name for a roller mill. However, the article implies Unifine is a different milling technology. One of the important references likely to shed some light is out of print and unavailable. Comfr (talk) 17:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)