Talk:Undress code

When the POVs and unreferenced material is all removed there is nothing left- the basketball stuff is adequately covered in that article. Undress code seems to be a joke term with no substance. r to my talk page I am not watching, I suggest {{delete}} --ClemRutter (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Reliable sources for the term dharmic religions?

Where are the reliable sources that use the term dharmic religions in the context of this article? Dharmic religions is a now deleted obscure neologism and should not be used throughout Wikipedia. Andries 15:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

It is not an obscure neologism. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

If it is not an obscure neologism then it would be easy to provide multiple reliable sources books, peer reviewed articles etc. I am waiting. I am also waiting for use of the phrase in the context of this article. Andries 17:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I propose to use the alternative phrase Indian religions. The number of google scholar results for "Indian religions"+"Indian religion" is (45.600 + 84.200) while it is only (492+475) for "dharmic religions" +"dharmic religion". See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_September_8. Andries 19:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Question about types of jobs.

Hi. I read on here, that some jobs require the service provider to be underdressed. Which jobs are these, as I don't see any examples, in the article.

Thanks, for your time. --Hacker1 (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC).

External link removed

This external link to The Costumer's Manifesto is dead, but more pertinently seems from an archive copy to have been nothing more than a big list of mildly-organized links regarding Victorian clothing. I've left it here in case anyone wants do dig around for any useful information about historical reductions in clothing.--Anon423 (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)