Talk:Ultimate++
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Cth027 in topic Lack of independent sources
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editNote: Above notice has wrong AfD linked, actual one was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate++ (2nd nomination) Luzr (talk) 08:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed, thanks ~ mazca talk 08:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Why is the same feature also the No.1 topic in criticism? ProfWho (talk) 12:24, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Lack of independent sources
editThis article is mainly sourced with pages of the project, and a couple of forum posts. Wikipedia is not an advertising service, and more independent sources are needed to demonstrate notability of the topic and objectivity. Christophe (talk) 14:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)