Talk:Tropical Storm Fabio (2006)/GA1
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Dana boomer in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The external link dead links
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Refs 9 and 10 should have the publisher information after the title.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
There is one minor issue with references and one with MOS, so I am putting the article on hold to allow you time to deal with these. If you have any questions, drop me a note here or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 18:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Since Hurricanehink is on a break, or as stated by his userpage, I've gone ahead and fixed the three things you've stated. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping out! Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article to GA status. Dana boomer (talk) 20:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)