Talk:Triangular prismatic honeycomb
Latest comment: 2 years ago by KlokkoVanDenBerg in topic Duals
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Triangular prismatic honeycomb article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Convexity edit
The illustrations give the "Type" of each tessellation as "Convex uniform honeycomb|Uniform honeycomb" (Uniform honeycomb) in all cases but the second-last (gyrated triangular prismatic honeycomb), where it's named simply "Convex uniform honeycomb" (Convex uniform honeycomb). I can't see any good reason to treat them differently. Each has the comment "It is one of 28 convex uniform honeycombs."
And the last illustration (gyroelongated triangular prismatic honeycomb) may be of a uniform honeycomb, but is it convex? It alone doesn't have the comment "It is one of 28 convex uniform honeycombs."
Duals edit
what are the duals of the last two? KlokkoVanDenBerg (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)