Talk:Total Package Procurement
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Total Package Procurement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Absent punctuation
editThis article is poorly written. Technicalities all over it, very long sentences with no commas in them, 'complexibility' isn't even a word. I now only have a vary vague idea of what TPP is, and sincerely feel dumber after having read this page.
TPP is a method of procuring at the outset of the acquisition phase under a single contract containing price performance and schedule commitments the maximum practical amount of design development production and support needed to introduce and sustain a system or component in the inventory.
Seriously? TPP is a method of procuring WHAT? What's the direct object? Is everything a subordinate clause? Help! 79.16.214.222 (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Dissident Aggressor 21:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Public domain info
editNote that the info from the GAO is in the public domain. Some info is verbatim and is cited. The Dissident Aggressor 17:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Jargon
edit"Discouraging contractors from buying in on the design and development effort with the intention of recovering on the subsequent production program" This sentence is jargon as I do not understand what "buying in" means and I am an aerospace engineer. @DissidentAggressor maybe you can clarify ? Czarking0 (talk) 04:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)