Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Raeft in topic See also

See also edit

The See also section here is relevant, it references topics that deal with Cruise, and will be expanded upon. Smee 04:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. Raeft 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? Smee 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).Reply
"Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation." - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! Smee 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC).Reply
Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... Raeft 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

*1 img, 4 citations, could use expansion, more citations. Smee 07:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

Last edited at 07:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)