Talk:Three of a Kind (The X-Files)/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Grapple X in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 01:28, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Eurgh, Modeski. I always thought that was a really trite way to motivate the Lone Gunmen's episodes.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- "I'd been thinking a lot about what happened to Susanne Modeski—what happened to her after she drove off with X in that mysterious car at the end of 'Unusual Suspects' an where she would" -> I think the end of this sentence might be missing, or else Gilligan might have lost the plot a little.
Might be worth noting which episode Vancouver actually represented Vancouver, because I'm totally not remembering it and I've seen these all a few times now. :/
- "I'd been thinking a lot about what happened to Susanne Modeski—what happened to her after she drove off with X in that mysterious car at the end of 'Unusual Suspects' an where she would" -> I think the end of this sentence might be missing, or else Gilligan might have lost the plot a little.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- You could lose ref 4 (the citation of the episode itself). If you want to cite something that happens in the episode, I guess you could just use the same ref as for the plot summary, but citing the article's subject is a bit redundant.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Guess it's as good as it's going to be, but it should be alright. If that Examinations book gives a review of this one it'd definitely be worth adding, though.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Doesn't seem to be a problem.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Grand.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Again, I'm thinking that we might be missing a trick with the screenshot. It might be worth using one which clearly shows the Las Vegas filming location, since it's probably the only thing that's really specific to just this one episode.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not a lot to address here. Just, what, another two articles until season six is ready for a GT nomination? GRAPPLE X 01:28, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- OK, I fixed the prose errors and uploaded a new screenshot of The Lone Gunmen in front of the Monte Carlo with a caption about the episode being filmed in Las Vegas.--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Pass for this one. GRAPPLE X 03:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I fixed the prose errors and uploaded a new screenshot of The Lone Gunmen in front of the Monte Carlo with a caption about the episode being filmed in Las Vegas.--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)