Talk:Things (software)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this an article or advertisement edit
This article seems to be a list of features and lacks any third-party references. This makes the article look suspiciously like advertising.imars (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, @Imars, and tagged. Barely a couple of mentions in RSs: Should it be AfD'd Talk to SageGreenRider 22:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- In its favor, i did find a few sources:
- http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2009-11-13/germans-catch-the-iphone-apps-wave
- https://web.archive.org/web/20120106225242/http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/story/2011-12-25/productivity-technology/52195624/1
- https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-165744310.html
- http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/technology/personaltech/09basics.html
- http://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2014/05/27/what-are-the-best-day-to-day-time-saving-hacks
Talk to SageGreenRider 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I tried to make changes to move the tone of this article away from such an advertisement, but the creators (I did a search to see where the revisions were coming from and they originated in Stuttgart, Germany... the home of the company, Cultured Code) seem hell-bent on edit-warring and removing any negative content from the article. It started out by removing citations to back up some of the public criticisms that the company has experienced so that what I had added looked like vandalism. Then they removed the entire section. --JC Berger (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2016 (UTC)