Talk:The Victorian Society

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article seems to lack objectivity, using adjectives such as "special" and "precious". Suggest that this is changed.

Removed offending words. Oosoom ^Talk to me 16:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Advertisement edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article has been marked with the advert template because of the use of campaigning language ("to fight the then widespread ignorance,") and content directly from their website.

For example, the tone and much of the phrasing of the article seems to be remarkably similar to the organisation's own content. (c.f. http://www.victoriansociety.org.uk/about/ and http://www.victoriansociety.org.uk/news/victorian-society-and-save-take-sheffield-council-to-court-over-jessop-hosp/) Zach Beauvais (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Have tried to give some more, non VS-generated, references, and do a bit more to tone down the "advertorial" tone. Hope it's considered sufficient to justify removal of the templates, which I have done. KJP1 (talk) 11:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic