Talk:The Rules of the Institution and Other Stories

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Drm310 in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it contains original and worthy information that does not appear in the Golden Wit page. Actually, Golden wit page mentions very little information about the book.

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it contains relevant and original information about the book and its content. Golden Wit page only mentions little information. Besides, Golden Wit website text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria Cecilia de la Vega (talkcontribs) 14:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it contains relevant and original information about the book and its content. Golden Wit page only mentions little information. Besides, Golden Wit website text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Regards, Cecilia. P.S. Sorry, I didn't know I had to sign. Now I think I did it properly. I'm learning. --Maria Cecilia de la Vega (talk) 14:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Maria Cecilia de la Vega: It's agreed there was no copyright violation, so the speedy tag was removed. But just FYI, CC BY-SA 4.0 is not a compatible license per Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. As such, you won't be able to copy text verbatim from the Golden Wit site. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply