Talk:The Ringworld Engineers

Latest comment: 13 hours ago by MarcGarver in topic mistakes

Publication History Issue

edit

Untitled

edit

I have removed the following two items from the "[publication history]".

The first paragraph states that the book was first published in 1980. Therefore, these two references must be false. It also casts a dubious light on the remaining items in the publication history.

-- pedant (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Could this possibly be the origin of popular game series 'Halo'??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.93.54.76 (talk) 08:21, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Teela

edit

how coy, lets not say what happened to her. folks, always read the novel or see the movie before reading the article here, as the plot summary should reveal all significant plot points. I would add it, but i dont quite recall exactly what happened to her.99.23.83.211 (talk) 03:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Ringworld Engineers/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Just curious, what sources would you expect this article to cite? It's about one specific book, whose ISBN is given. Do you want page numbers?

24.196.88.156 04:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Paul

Last edited at 04:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

mistakes

edit

the article on the first novel has a section for mistakes; this one does not, & should. couple I've found on re-reading- there is mention of mining, which would be pretty much impractical on the ringworld, & of trading tooled leather-goods, without mention of the (presumably) herd animals from which the 'leather' would be derived. while louis is exploring the map-room, the puppeteer tells him to expect the lander at dusk. but the lander has been commandeered by the kzin; niven means a stepping disc here, as mentioned earlier in the same chapter, & not the lander. there are others.... & many uses of earth-related comparisons for scale or cultural reference. it's not as carefully constructed, generally, as the first novel.

duncanrmi (talk) 09:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

You can't include a "mistake" that you have decided is a mistake from reading the book, that would be original research. You need to find a published reliable source that mentions the mistake - e.g., a magazine article or another book. MarcGarver (talk) 08:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply