Talk:The Outcasts of Poker Flat

Reads like a low-effort book report

This article is in need of a better summary. As I haven't read the book, I don't feel qualified to update the plot section of the article. That said, it reads like a biased book report and needs a rewrite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.177.247.230 (talk) 18:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

is this neutral?

"His compelling combination of realism and sentimentality..."

Keyword: compelling. I see an element of bias and opinion here. Infact, I think exactly the opposite, his work is does not compel me, it is not compelling in my opinion. Keyword: opinion, as in my opinion contradicts the other writer's opinion about this story. This is therefore not neutral. Remove it now or I will change compelling to pretentious. 67.0.8.94 (talk) 16:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Outcasts of Poker Flat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060518194308/http://dram.nyu.edu/dram/note.cgi?id=8801 to http://dram.nyu.edu/dram/note.cgi?id=8801
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060718134915/http://pikappalambda.capital.edu/organization.html to http://pikappalambda.capital.edu/organization.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)