Talk:The Origins of Political Order

Latest comment: 5 years ago by PaleoNeonate in topic Primary source claims presented as facts

Improvements

edit

An article has to start somewhere. How else can it be improved? DanielDemaret (talk) 11:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Reviews

edit

--Anthonyhcole (talk) 04:43, 25 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Gray's so called review hardly reviews the book at all, it mostly deals with criticism towards his previous book.Star Lord - 星王 (talk) 17:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Pfaff's and Ikenberry's reviews require a subscription.Star Lord - 星王 (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply


Translucing it here while trying to learn about DYK.

Star Lord - 星王 (talk) 12:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Primary source claims presented as facts

edit

The article includes various statements presented as facts even if they are erroneous, such as: "This is because chimps, the genetic ancestors to humans, engage in kin relations based on cooperation" (Chimpanzee shares a distant common ancestor with humans, homo sapiens does not derive from the Pan genus, although both are Hominidae). The article also relies too much on the primary source (the book), thus the resulting text may also include editor original research when interpreting its claims. —PaleoNeonate09:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply