Talk:The Laughing Gnome

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 154.73.217.18 in topic Musical standards

Musical standards

edit

Despite this wanton abandonment of Bowie’s musical standards

"Wanton abandonment"? Apart from the chipmunk backing vocals, this actually isn't all that far removed from the other stuff he was doing in 1967 - "Love You Till Tuesday" et al. Bowie was all for childlike lyrics and bubblegum playfulness at that stage of his career; it's not as if he had lapsed from something like Ziggy Stardust in order to do "The Laughing Gnome". 217.155.20.163 12:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removed in the recent rewrite... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
The assertion that it is a pastiche of Tony Newley doesn’t have any citations - isn’t this just original research? Just as he wasn’t “abandoning standards” to do this, the use of the word “pastiche” seems to suggest that he was being subversive or ironic, when, as the earlier comment says, this was as much his modus operandi of the time as anything else. It could have been intended as an imitation or homage to Newley, which would reflect differently upon it than pastiche suggests. Had this been a huge hit, he might had far more material like this in his back catalogue. Jock123 (talk) 09:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Newley influence: https://www.reddit.com/r/DavidBowie/comments/444ssv/bowie_explains_the_newley_connection/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.73.217.18 (talk) 06:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rumour-source wanted

edit

I've seen a claim that Bowie said he considered doing it in a 'Velvet Underground' (I assume that means drone?) arrangement on his Sound+Vision Tour until he found out about the NME was behind the campaign. I'm sure this is probably a myth, but if anyone has a source please let me know. Blythwood (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Updated now I've found a comment about it on Bowie's website. Blythwood (talk) 20:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Laughing Gnome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply