Talk:The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 21:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   Comment - GA is not dependent upon this, but under the Themes section, there is repetitiveness in wording: Mother Jones the Enterprise was defeated not by its traditional enemies such as the Klingons but by a stupid NBC executive and Jon Corey not Khan Noonien Singh or the Klingons that defeated the Enterprise but an enemy much more powerful — the NBC executives appearing one paragraph after the other as it does. Might want to reword one or the other.

   AGF on offline sourcing. I also ran Earwig, which showed no issues of concern, except for the place where it compared the article with itself as a copy.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   In fact, this article survived AFD on 7 October 2015, and on 8 October Cirt began a major improvement of the article. Cirt has been the primary editor since then.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   The image of John Belushi as Kirk is Fair Use. All others are licensed on Commons.

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Good work. — Maile (talk) 22:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Maile66, most appreciated ! — Cirt (talk) 04:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)