Talk:The History of Love

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

parts are interpretation, not summary

Latest comment: 3 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some parts of this article seem to be the author's ideas about the novel, including interpretations, rather than research and factual reporting. This is particularly the case toward the end of the summary. Shouldn't the interpretations (which read like part of an essay) be removed as overly subjective? Skrolik (talk) 03:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic