Talk:The Great Ziegfeld/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Smarojit (talk · contribs) 15:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Will review it in the next couple of days. --smarojit ^HD 15:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

In my opinion, this is one of the best film-related articles on Wikipedia and meets each one of the GA criteria. Happy to pass this with no comments, not even minor ones. Excellent job!:) --smarojit ^HD 09:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)