Talk:The Demolished Man

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 91.10.15.208 in topic Wyg&

Created stub

edit

I created this stub so that the novel will show up in the list of science fiction novels. The content is just copied from the Alfred Bester article, sorry if this isn't correct procedure. -A.Miller --12.216.16.110 23:27, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Demolishedman masterworks.gif

edit
 

Image:Demolishedman masterworks.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Einstein/Eisenstein?

edit

... an eyeball floating in a stein; (an eye in a stein -> eye in stein -> Einstein)

Phonetically, that sounds a lot more to me like "Eisenstein" than "Einstein", but I haven't read the book so don't know how the allusion is spelled out; are fans of the book sure he wasn't referring to the filmmaker rather than the physicist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by A. Swearengen (talkcontribs) 13:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

What part of "an" do you not understand? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.171 (talk) 21:57, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
In the book Einstein is explicitly stated to be the answer. Leushenko (talk) 23:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Phonetically? Where's the /z/ or [z]?
  • eye in stein   -> Einstein
  • eyes in stein -> Eisenstein
No plural on "eye", ∴ no "s", ∴ no [z], ∴ no Eisenstein, ∴ Einstein. Q.E.D.--Thnidu (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

"@kins"

edit

The use of "@" in @kins (Atkins) predates Internet e-mail by at least 18 years... AnonMoos (talk) 06:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


But the use of "@" for "at" in quoting prices -- "5 apples @ 50¢" = "5 apples at 50¢ apiece" -- predates "@kins" by at least 52 years.
The Underwood Typewriter Company included the symbol on the keyboard of "Underwood No. 5" in 1900, and it was included on subsequent typewriters and their successors' keyboards. (@)
--Thnidu (talk) 19:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC) (Dear me, what do they teach them in those schools?)Reply

Dishonest Abe

edit

I got the impression that Lincoln was himself the product of a demolition, and "Dishonest Abe" some vestige of the old criminal personality. Is there any criticism of the book that brings this up? --Starwed (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Freudian

edit

This would benefit from an analysis of the Freudian themes that underlie the understanding of psychology at the time. They form the backbone of story including the desire to kill the father and the sublimated, to the sister, desire to boink the mother. These themes are part of the reason that it was a great work when written and kind of cute/silly now 75.191.151.75 (talk) 08:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I find it humorous that a hypocrite with a tag in his profile against censorship would delete this for such a minor issue as not liking the word "boink" rather than addressing the issue raised. 75.191.151.75 (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'll give you a chance here. First, lay off the personal attack. Second, I can't take your discussion seriously when you're using terms like "boink," which leads me to believe this post is not an honest attempt to improve the article. Finally, unless you have some citations about Freud's theories being an influence on book, there's no reason to bring it up here. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 14:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Okay, so he wanted to FUCK his sister. Happy now? Do you want to boink YOUR sister? Or just FUCK your mom?
"Hypocrite" in this context is a perfectly adequate term for someone "with a tag in his profile against censorship".— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.129 (talkcontribs) 08:47, February 22, 2011

Wyg&

edit

The ampersand is a ligature of et (Latin for and), so I always read that as "Wyget", not "Wygand".

Can someone provide a reliable source for the current version? ---- 91.10.15.208 (talk) 00:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply