Talk:The Boat Race 1905/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 19:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   No copyvios detected.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

   "...and he was replaced by novice P. H. Thomas, unfit having recently returned from Africa.[10]" - shouldn't this be "who was unfit, having recently returned from Africa?"--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Follows MOS standards.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   Has a well-formatted reference section.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

   B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:

   Adequate citations to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

   C. No original research:

   All content is verifiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   No undue detail, the article is quite short, actually.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

   Stays focused on the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral, balanced presentation.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   The entire history consists of three edits, so yes, quite stable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   One image is public domain, and the other is under Creative Commons.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   Images are relevant with suitable captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

7. Overall: Just one problematic sentence.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Resolved. Pass.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

1. Pass or Fail:

Thank you, I believe I've addressed your concern, but of course, let me know if there's anything else I can adjust. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

All set.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)