Talk:Templeton Rye

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Reads like an advertisement edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I love Templeton Rye. It's quite good. But this entry reads like a corporate website, not like a Wikipedia entry. It might be good to move this closer to a neutral POV.

65.190.82.130 (talk) 17:18, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The vast majority was copied verbatim form the company website and thus in blatant violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. --Bobak (talk) 22:41, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not an advertising channel edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Twice in the past few days the article has been replaced by extracts from a company press release. The current article contains reliably sourced third-party content. The replacement stuff is not. The replacement stuff also wipes out the unsavory recent history. — Laurain611 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. . If that SPA editor wants to add some pertinent reliably sourced third-party content that would be fine. Contributions to Wikipedia are encouraged. But what has been going on is not contributing. M.boli (talk) 02:29, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic