Talk:Switzman v Elbling

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm not sure how to change the title but it is wrong, it should be Elbing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.58.230.168 (talk) 23:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

New?

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I was under the impression the padlock law was enacted in 1937, which would make it 11 years old at the time of the incident, and 20 years old by the date of appeal - hardly new. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.154.204 (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic