This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I notice most of these have not been categorised as either illuminated manuscripts or (if appropriate) incunabulum. Also the later ones were? presumably printed? Either way the article should say this. Johnbod 04:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
the Wickiana was printed, and is as such not really part of, but rather a continuation of, the "illustrated chronicles" tradition. dab(𒁳) 09:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
in fact, it is a collection, including both manuscripts and prints of all descriptions. dab(𒁳) 10:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks - I'll add a bit to the article - please check & correct if necessary. Johnbod 15:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
