Talk:Swaythling

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Cite for "prettiest railway station" edit

This was one of the first big edits I made when I was a very new Wikipedia editor, and I wasn't too familiar with all the policies, particlularly WP:NOR. The information came from local people, but I must admit I haven't seen it written anywhere, so it should probably be removed. The "prettiest railway station" competition ran back in the days of the nationalised British Rail, and I expect it would be difficult to find any records to it surviving. Waggers 20:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have to be honest. Swaythling railway station is not pretty Supposed (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
It was once. waggers (talk) 15:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge edit

I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page. Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Against the merge. There's a policy that says all places are notable. Adam McCormick 01:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Swaythling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply