Talk:Supersymmetry algebras in 1 + 1 dimensions

Latest comment: 6 years ago by EduardoW in topic Complete rewrite?

Isn't the notation misleading??? definitely isn't the hermitian conjugate of Q, because 2(H+P) definitely isn't the hermitian conjugate of 2(H-P). Both Q and are self-conjugate. AnonyScientist (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Hermitian conjugate is not usually denoted by the overbar, the standard notation is the dagger or the star. The overbar is used to denote complex conjugation. I don't know exactly why it is used in the literature in this case, but I guess that the reason is something like the following: Q and corresponds to and , which are sometimes written as and , and the latter are complex conjugates of each other if and are real. The overbar for Q hints to this. Nevertheless, I don't want to say that this overbar notation is the best possible one... Rzs8750 (talk) 16:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

 Done notation changed in rewrite EduardoW (talk) 09:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Complete rewrite?

edit

Comparing this article to Mirror Symmetry by Kentaro Hori et al., pages 283, 288, 289, this article seems to be plain wrong in several regards. If there are no objections I will rewrite the entire article and also cover the N=(2,2) and N=(0,2) cases based on this source.EduardoW (talk) 08:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Done EduardoW (talk) 09:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply