Talk:Supermarine Spitfire (late Merlin-powered variants)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Notreallydavid in topic Mk IX clarification
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Supermarine Spitfire (late Merlin-powered variants) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Mk IX clarification edit
C type 'The first Mk IX Spitfires used as fighter-bombers began in June 1944.' Could somebody clarify?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Notreallydavid (talk • contribs) 18:13, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- I have restored the text as it was in June 2020 which was unambiguous. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 17:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)