This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I made this change as none of the 4 sources in the first sentence say anything about it being an anti-LGBT hate group. The closest "Counter-demonstrators accused those organizers of promoting an atmosphere of violence toward the LGBTQ community." which is presented as the source as simply the view of the organisers of the counter demonstrators. So as much as I may share this view, we need reliable sources before we can say it, in wikipedia voice. Maybe what I changed it to is not the best, but it's better than saying something which isn't supported by the inline citations provided. Frankly I'm unconvinced we should have an article on this organisation. Most of the sources simply seem to be about the parade. This may be one reason it's so hard to write anything useful about them. Nil Einne (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. And looking at the categories, none of them are unequivocally supported by WP:RS, we've only got WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV speculation by sources, and I'm not comfortable categorizing the article based on speculation. Elizium23 (talk) 21:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
