Talk:Super Black Market Clash
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Super Black Market Clash article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Bankrobber edit
I deleted the reference to "Bankrobber" as a single off Black Market Clash. I believe the converse is true, i.e., that the single came before BMC (which was by definition made up of hard-to-get or unreleased tracks). Further, I believe "Bankrobber" was only a single in the UK, while BMC was a US release. Anyone w/different info, pls share.Cloonmore (talk) 02:02, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
First things first edit
Shouldn't Black Market Clash be lsited before Super? 70.88.213.74 (talk) 20:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. I think it is a good idea. I consider Black Market Clash a studio album more than a compilation, because it features many previously unreleased songs. But, the article title is "Super..." so it is not possible to do it at the moment. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 14:09, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Update
I think it would be better to move this page to Black Market Clash, but we must pay careful attention to this "move" because it is linked by 96 articles in the mainspace (excluding transluctions and redirects). If you agree, but do not know how to do so, then, please, send me a message on my talk page, and I'll do it. Thanks. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 11:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree, it should be moved. It shouldn't be a proplem to just move the page, won't everything redirect? Chadwholovedme (talk) 14:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Agree. Currently the articles reads like two articles tacked onto each other, and that needs to be fixed as well. Morganfitzp (talk) 12:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)