Talk:Summit Brewing Company

Microbrewery?

This article just got categorized as a category:microbreweries? Is this appropriate? Summit produces (the last time I checked) over 40,000 gallonsbarrels, which is well over what most people would label a microbrewery? I'm moving to remove the categorization... other opinions? -- Kaszeta 23:35, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

In the rec.food.drink.beer faq (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/beer-faq/part2/) it gives this info -- According to the Institute of Brewing there are four categories as follows:

Large Brewers - Production in excess of 500,000 barrels/year

Regional Brewers - Production between 15,000 and 500,000 bbl/yr

Microbrewers - Production less than 15,000 bbl/yr

Brewpubs - Production for onsite consumption only

If Summit brews 40,000 gallons then that's about 1290 barrels (assuming 31 gals/bbl), so that would be micro. If you meant they produce 40K barrels then they'd be regional.

Oops, I meant 40,000 barrels. Here's an outdated link[1]. It's a fairly large regional brewer (and, indeed, when I last toured they got upset if you called them a microbrewery). -- Kaszeta 17:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

FYI, Summit is brewing well over 60,000 barrels per year right now. - Ryan

I believe they are clasified as a Regional Craft Brewery.--E tac (talk) 04:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Summit brewery logo.jpg

Image:Summit brewery logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Summit Brewing Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120512173328/http://www.mtshastanews.com/news/x1196570919/Mt-Shasta-Brewing-comes-out-on-top-again to http://www.mtshastanews.com/news/x1196570919/Mt-Shasta-Brewing-comes-out-on-top-again

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)