Talk:Suiattle River/Archives/2024/September

This is an archive of past discussions about Suiattle River. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TheNuggeteer talk 13:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that every summer, the Suiattle River dirties the Sauk with glacial debris?

Source: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2017/5113/sir20175113.pdf pg. 1

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Southern chivalry

Promoted to Good Article by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 78 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 01:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC).

Hi, I will be reviewing this today. :) Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 18:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Overall, I think this is pretty good! Although I feel like the hook could be a teensy bit more interesting, I'll let that pass because it is still something that sounds cool. The source is a-okay (and mentions it, the most important part), as well as date of the GA promotion and length of the article itself. No image, so no issues there, sources in the article itself are good, neutrality checks off, and while Earwig did find a ~27% copyvio likeliness, that's still pretty low. QPQ is done, so everything checks off! (Good luck on that Francis Bacon source!) Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 18:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)