Talk:Substitution of dangerous chemicals
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article references a source that one of the article's contributors may have written or published. Citing oneself is allowed on Wikipedia, but may represent a conflict of interest. Contributors should be careful not to place undue weight on their own work, and are discouraged from excessive self-citation. Guidelines relevant to this situation include Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and WP:SELFPUBLISHED.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ambean16.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Close Paraphrasing
editThis article is too close a paraphrase to the article listed in the references(http://www.arbejdskemi.dk/substitution.htm). I will be making edits to the paraphrasing and adding additional sources. --Ambean16 (talk) 15:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete info
edit"This process-based method is especially suitable in following cases: processes for which little knowledge of chemical factors of occupational exists, because these will be elucidated systematically and dealt with. processes with many chemical products, because this opens up several possibilities for substitution. processes with many types of design. processes for which alternative processes exist selection and development of new technology, because potential hazards due to chemicals are systematically worked through."
I don't think this is needed in this article. It is directly quoted from http://www.arbejdskemi.dk/substitution.htm and refers to a specific method of study which I don't think is broad enough for Wikipedia. --Ambean16 (talk) 01:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Verifying Work and citing your sources
editI would like to know where you are citing your work most of the things in your article are not verified please do so --Ammonia NH3 (talk) 13:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)