Talk:Stupid Love (Lady Gaga song)/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Sources

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Done

Extended content

---Another Believer _(Talk) 03:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Jason Derulo song

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Resolved

Should Stupid Love (song) be moved to Stupid Love (Jason Derulo song)? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

@Nahnah4: I see you removed the hatnote... thoughts? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Update:

Done Thanks to User:Nahnah4. Stupid Love (song) is now a disambiguation page. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:LG6

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've added mention of this song as the lead single to Draft:LG6. I should note, the billboard confirming the single's release mentions "LG-6" specifically, so this might be a confirmation of the album's title? Chromatica is also a speculative title. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Lithuania

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

This edit request to Stupid Love (Lady Gaga song) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

"Stupid Love" debuted at #9 in Lithuania https://www.agata.lt/lt/naujienos/savaites-klausomiausi-2020w10/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConnorBehrens (talk • contribs) 20:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:47, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Weekly charts

Chart (2020)	Peak position
Lithuania (AGATA)^[1]	9

Add Lithuania to charts

References

^ "AGATA Singles Chart". AGATA. March 7, 2020. Retrieved March 7, 2020.

Add Lithuania to the charts section ConnorBehrens (talk) 02:50, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Done QueerFilmNerd^talk 19:45, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

More sources

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Chart positions

Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hey, according to sources some chart positions are uncorrect, and "Stupid Love" didn't charted on Dance/Mix Airplay, at least it's not visible in my laptop. :v infsai (dyskusja) 14:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Infsai, If you can identify any specific remaining inaccuracies, that'd be helpful. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Well, now every number is the same, but a week ago I saw different peaks on Billboard charts than they were presented in article... infsai (dyskusja) 13:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Infsai, Can I archive this section if the problem is resolved? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Of course. infsai (dyskusja) 13:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks!

Done ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft

Latest comment: 4 years ago14 comments3 people in discussion

Discussion re: draft article

@Gagaluv1: You might be interested in this draft! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:39, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

@Lk95: You might be interested as well. Updates are needed at Draft:LG6 as well. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Hey, I added some information on the song's mainspace because it's rumored to be released soon. If it turns out to be scrapped/postponed, we can redirect the mainspace back to this draft and work on it until it's coming out. -- Lk95 10:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Lk95, Please contribute to the draft and not the main space. There's no way editors will want to keep the article in the main space at this time. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:32, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Lk95, Did you want to recap the pumpkin bit here as well? I shared a Billboard link below which might be helpful. Seems some folks are already writing song descriptions, which means a "Reception" section might be needed before the song is even released! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Another Believer, nobody is forced to work on yours, or any, draft, so Lk95 does not have to do anything (I know he knows this, and I know you didn't say he "has" to either, but you are essentially saying he should). Users can start an article if they think it's notable, as Lk95 obviously did, regardless of the existence of a draft. Also, recruiting users to work on your draft to make it notable for you is a bad look. Ss112 03:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Ss112, Uh, ok, 'twas just an invite. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 03:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Well, personally, I'll be restoring Lk95's mainspace article from a redirect if it's not already restored as soon as the song is officially confirmed :) Ss112 03:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

@Lk95: Ss112 seems to be bothered by people working in the draft space, for whatever reason. If you'd like to contribute to this draft, you're more than welcome. If you're not interested, that's fine as well! Happy editing, --Another Believer _(Talk) 03:58, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, no, that's not what I said at all. I didn't say I was bothered by users working in the draftspace. Only when you're trying to recruit other users to work on it for you and tell a user who started the mainspace article to instead work on your draft...that you're aiming to have replace their article/redirect. Why would anyone who created the mainspace article do that? They deserve credit for their separate work just as much as you do (when/if you actually do it). You can try and convince Lk95 to be on-side, but I'm sure any user knows they can work on a draft you started. Just like mainspace articles, users are well aware nobody owns drafts so it's redundant to say "you can work on this article!" Like, thanks, we all know we can if we wanted to. Ss112 04:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Ss112, Ok, I'm not going to get into another back and forth with you. Moving on to other things now... ---Another Believer _(Talk) 04:06, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Then don't claim I said things I didn't say, and we won't have a "back and forth". I also do not require nor want pings basically ever. Thanks. Ss112 04:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

More:

---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)