Talk:Steavenson Falls

	Australia portal Steavenson Falls is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Rivers: Waterfalls Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

POV and out of date

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As well as reading like a direct copy of a tourist brochure, this article is now largely of historical interest only because of the bushfire of 7th February 2009. The descriptions of the forest and infrastructure are now just plain wrong. The whole article needs a rewrite. Might be a holiday project. HiLo48 (talk) 07:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bushfire

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've just added a small comment about damage caused by the 7 Feb bushfire. The article still needs a major rewrite. HiLo48 (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic