Talk:Stealing a Nation

I'm a big whiny baby

Diego Garica is hardly a nation and it belongs to the United Kingdom. No one else. It is British and seeing as it's the only group of islands that the UK has remaining in the area, hopefully it will always remain so! YourPTR! 10:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Please read WP:TALK. Talk pages are not for expressing your opinion on a subject, but for discussing suggested improvements to an article. Waggers 11:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Harassment

Anonimski should stop stalking and harassing me. I removed editorialising, but Anonimski has followed me to this article - as so may others - to automatically revert. This harassment should stop. bobrayner (talk) 17:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your total blanking of the article (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stealing_a_Nation&diff=639679114&oldid=625874371) speaks for itself. And I interpret your accusation of harassment as an attempt to harass me, because I've behaved in a normal way and have suddenly gotten myself dragged into nonsense by you again.

In case you haven't realized it: there are always going to be people that don't agree with your views on how certain articles should be, and that's not harassment, it's a normal part of being a Wikipedia editor. You've stated "This harassment should stop", but there isn't any harassment here to stop.- Anonimski (talk) 20:39, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

You followed me to this article and automatically reverted everything I have done, with spurious arguments, as you have at other pages. You reverted Alazki, too, because their improvements to the article were similar to mine. That is harassment. Stop it. bobrayner (talk) 12:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

I have not reverted Alazki, I augmented the text with a sourced fact that got lost in the rewrite while keeping the phrasing. You're removing sourced facts and linking to WP:Harassment when I revert you. If anything, that would be an example of harassment against me. - Anonimski (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stealing a Nation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140305080726/http://www.rts.org.uk/programme-awards-winners-2004 to http://www.rts.org.uk/programme-awards-winners-2004

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

columbusfilmcouncil.org link is dead

The link to "The 53rd Annual Chris Awards Columbus International Film & Video Festival 2005" under References is dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20150509210000/http://www.columbusfilmcouncil.org/download/05chrisprogram.pdf seems to be a valid permalink. I tried to figure out how to update the references myself, but the terminology and etiquette here are beyond my ken. Sorry! Cariad Eccleston (talk) 08:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)