Talk:St. Louis Board of Aldermen

unfinished business

these maps are temporary as they will be redrawn by the census, but they can still be helpful in the short run.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Board of Aldermen of the City of St. Louis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150312125641/http://www.slpl.lib.mo.us:80/cco/Rules/append.htm to http://www.slpl.lib.mo.us/cco/Rules/append.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 26 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 16:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

---

Board of Aldermen of the City of St. Louis → St. Louis Board of Aldermen – This organization is consistently known as the "St. Louis Board of Aldermen" in all reliable sources. This article is one of very few results I could find that calls it the "Board of Aldermen of the City of St. Louis". We should use the name which is most widely used among RS. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 15:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Graphic of Seats

Hello, I could not figure out how to update the number of seats, categorized by party/color, to the page. It shows the old board of 28 seats, and it should be 14 seats now, with 14 Democrats holding the seats (STL implemented ward reduction, cutting the number of seats in half from 28 to 14). Please update the graphic to reflect 14 blue seats. Allbirdy (talk) 01:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Gender-neutral terminology

There have been multiple recent attempts to add gender-neutral language to this article. The overwhelming majority of sources still use the name "St. Louis Board of Aldermen" when referring to the legislature itself, including:

• The official city website
• The recently-passed legislative rules package (which comes straight from the new leadership and therefore should represent the most accurate self-naming of the Board)
• Major local news outlets (1, 2).

The best evidence for the term "Board of Alderpersons" is in the text of Proposition R (2022), which does use that term to refer to the legislature as a whole. But the idea that this usage of terminology constitutes a full renaming of the legislature seems to only come from an interpretation by Ballotpedia. Clearly no official sources share that interpretation and "Board of Aldermen" is still colloquially used universally.

That 2023 rules package does, however, use the term "alderperson" to refer generically to members of the Board of Aldermen. I think usage of "alderperson" is appropriate when referencing:

• The generic political office of alderperson, or
• A group of mixed-gender alderpersons

As far as personal titles for individual members, I think "alderman" or "alderwoman" should be preferred to "alderperson" when gender is certain. For example: "Alderwoman Alisha Sonnier" and not "Alderperson Alisha Sonnier". I don't believe there is currently an incumbent alderperson who does not identity as a man or a woman, but "Alderperson" would be appropriate as a personal title in that case. Benn257 (talk) 20:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)