Talk:Spymaster (character)

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Paleface Jack in topic Expansion

Image edit

Could someone find a picture of Spymaster with less terrible anatomy for the picture? It's a bit unseemly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.22.167 (talk) 09:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Spymaster.gif edit

 

Image:Spymaster.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spymaster II first appearance edit

It seems nobody can agree on this. This article contradicts itself, citing Iron Man (Vol. 1) #254 in the infobox and Iron Man (Vol. 3) #8 in the article. The character's entry on the Comic Book Database cites Iron Man (Vol. 1) #330. Just wondering if anyone knows of any other trusted sources that can be turned to for this. Sonam8311 (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Expansion edit

This article is way too short with the publication history and fictional character biography not that well developed, they both should be expanded in more detail than what they currently have so far.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply