This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Spiral (Pendulum song) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Spiral (Pendulum song)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s)
Press [show] to view →
Start class:
Y A reasonably complete infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the single
Y A track listing
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current single; a band navbox is insufficient)
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year
C-class:
Y All the start class criteria
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians
N Reliable independent in-line references supporting claims
Y A casual reader should learn something about the song/single
B-class:
N All the C-class criteria
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources
– Lead section needs additional in-line references, all sources need to be reliable
N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
– Lead section contains information that should be under appropriate section headings, the lead should summarise the entire article
N No obvious omissions, but also no obvious extraneous information – such as "trivia"
– No information outside lead section on background, writing, marketing or release
Evaluation based on WikiProject Albumsassessment scale. Please update this list when the article meets (or fails to meet) any of the above criteria, changing the article's class assessment as appropriate. Last reviewed by – Ikaratalk → 20:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply